Artemis II Astronauts Return To Earth – Re-entry and Splashdown

45 Comments

  1. The Artemis program is sacrificing over $90 billion for distant prestige, a colossal sum that could nevertheless guarantee warmth for 170 million modest homes during A whole winter

  2. @NASASpaceflight
    Thanks !
    Excellent visuals!
    Great knowledgeable information from the NSF reporting team. The new reporter, Alice, seems like a GREAT addition to your commentary group.
    Keep her there.

  3. In the 1969 movie, at least they landed on the moon (supposedly), but now with all this technology, not even that. Only those Americans believe those stories…

  4. The recovery seems like a budget move, completely lacking appropriate equipment. What would they do in bad weather? Should the not just lift the entire capsule out? The tinkering with the rubber boats and the helicopters looks amateur – sorry, that’s more “got lucky with the weather” than well planned. Great space fight, but not quite as well planned to the end…

  5. I remember watching a reentry stream years ago and being surprised by how emotional the splashdown felt after hours of technical updates and calm voices. The moment the crew is finally back on Earth always hits harder than I expect.

  6. They literally got launched up to re-enter. A company to buy a visual. Not actual. If you're doing 24,000 mph entering into the Earth's atmosphere, that's only 60 mi. You would cover 60 mi in less than 10 seconds. Make it make sense that you're going at these speeds within that 60 mi and it's taking 4 minutes to get there. That you're going at these speeds within that 60 mi and it's taking 4 minutes to get there. Their BS of over correcting numbers going from low number back up to 60 mi back down. Use your actual working and thinking brain. 90 billion grifted away from the taxpayers. Ha😂 I'm no genius but I sure would love to use 90 billion to fix the planet we're on.

  7. So we are doing exactly what we did 57 years ago and they are now heros? When Musk lands the 36 story building called Starship on the moon then you can call it an advancement. Right now this is just a hurried retro copy of ancient engineering. At least the toilet worked on apollo

  8. Sooo what's the whole point?? Spend as much tax payers dollars as possible? Why is this important and how is this helping us earthlings?? You said hopefully many more splash downs to come!? For what!!?! ALL this money could be spent on something that actually helps all life on earth. Travelling around the moon seems like a huge waste of our hard earned money.

  9. Glad they all got back safe, but people don't seem to realise, these space missions are impacting badly on our weather notwithstanding the emissions polluting the atmosphere.!

  10. I still remember staying up for a splashdown stream years ago and being surprised by how tense the final minutes felt even when everything was nominal. Reentry always makes spaceflight feel suddenly physical again.

  11. This is an amazing feed, but why do people say this launch is for humanity? I think humanity needs to focus on earth. The environmental impact of each launch is immense.

  12. Ложь мирового уровня, а иначе американский Голливуд. Космонавты реально

    побывавшие в космосе не могли бы бегать по палубе корабля после приземления.

  13. They didn't go to the moon, they just orbited the moon. Don't make more out of it than it was. A lunar orbit was done in the 1960's so it's only a big deal of it wasn't done before.

Leave a Reply to @crispysuave7529 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 Som2ny Post - Theme by WPEnjoy