The Behavioral Health AI Boom Is Real. So Are the Risks

Behavioral health was once dismissed as secondary: unseen, underfunded, and misunderstood. Not anymore. Its stigma has faded, and the financial cost of neglecting it is too steep to ignore. Employers, payers, and policymakers are paying attention. But the landscape is increasingly difficult to navigate for patients and providers.

Government policy shifts are creating uncertainty, while the long-term impact of the pandemic is being downplayed. There’s fear that companies will quietly drop EAPs, raising questions about what happens when workplaces stop prioritizing mental health. Meanwhile, we’re seeing a bifurcated world emerge: one where some access real care, and others turn to AI like ChatGPT to manage issues like depression or OCD. We’re in the middle of a reckoning, and attention alone will not solve the problem.

As demand for behavioral health care surges, traditional care models are falling behind. A nationwide provider shortage and growing clinician burnout have left millions of Americans living in communities with no access to mental health professionals. For example, one in three adults struggling with anxiety cannot get the care they need. Clinicians are also seeing patients who need longer treatment and are presenting with more severe symptoms than in the past, forcing them to work at the limits of their capacity.

With more people requiring care and fewer clinicians available to deliver it, behavioral health is reaching a breaking point. Virtual care and digital tools are no longer just promising, they’re essential. This shift is helping fuel today’s mental health AI boom. The market is projected to grow from nearly $88 billion in 2024 to $132 billion by 2032, jumping 50% in only eight years. 

Thankfully, many of these emerging technologies show promise in easing the strain. AI-powered  tools are streamlining operations with automated workflows, smarter resource allocation, and faster documentation. On the frontlines of care, digital apps and telehealth platforms are transforming how and where people access support. 

But not every new solution delivers on its promises. The flood of AI-powered screening tools, chatbots, and clinical decision-making systems has made it harder — not easier — for providers, patients, payers, and employers to tell which tools truly improve care and which simply add to the noise. 

In a market full of potential, but vulnerable to overreach, it’s fair to ask: are we overestimating AI’s readiness in behavioral health? 

Not all AI is created equal

The behavioral health world is awash in AI, but its applications vary wildly in sophistication and impact.

Some tools are already delivering real impact. AI-driven intake assessments and symptom checkers help match patients to the right level of care faster and more accurately. Automated scribes and speech analysis tools cut down on clinical documentation time, giving providers more freedom to focus on the patient in front of them. Chatbots and mobile apps offer between-session support, helping patients stay engaged and connected when they need it most. These aren’t futuristic promises. They’re working solutions that reduce administrative strain, improve care delivery and make behavioral health more accessible.  

But in other cases, AI’s clinical credibility is far less convincing. Unlike radiology or cardiology, where clear FDA pathways exist, many behavioral health tools are built on shaky ground: small sample sizes, biased datasets, or no real-world testing. These models may produce confident-sounding but clinically flawed results, misguiding care, putting patients at risk, and exposing providers to legal and ethical fallout.

Rather than streamlining care, these tools often force regulators to step in, especially when AI begins influencing diagnoses or treatment decisions. That doesn’t unlock efficiency. It adds friction to an already overburdened system.

Some direct-to-consumer chatbots and self-help apps also overpromise and underdeliver, claiming to offer “therapy-like” support while lacking the ability to handle crisis situations, clinical nuance, or complex mental health needs. Meanwhile, tools like ChatGPT, which make no claim to meet safety or regulatory standards, are still used by millions for emotional support, simply because they’re free and easy to access.

Like any fast-moving market, behavioral health AI will have both breakthroughs and breakdowns. But despite its growing pains, we need to continue to push the field forward. With the right guardrails, AI can help us build a better behavioral health system. However, we need to be responsible regarding how it’s deployed and for what reasons, or we risk negative patient outcomes.

What responsible AI looks like

Whether you’re part of a large health system or running an independent practice, evaluating behavioral health AI takes more than optimism. It requires healthy skepticism. Providers, administrators, technologists, and revenue managers making these decisions can’t afford to blindly trust flashy demos or big promises.

The AI tools that will truly move the needle in behavioral health are not just centered around optimizing billing. Instead, they’re grounded in clinical validation, designed with providers in mind, and built to ease workloads. Unlike revenue cycle tools, which serve an important but invisible role, clinically-oriented solutions directly impact the patient experience and the clinician’s ability to deliver care. They improve encounters by helping clinicians spend less time fighting their tech stack and more time focused on the human connection that defines behavioral health:

• Clinically-grounded, not just clever – Red flags include weak privacy protections, tiny training datasets or a lack of peer-reviewed validation. Green flags include human-in-the-loop models, clearly defined limitations, and a focus on enhancing, not replacing, clinical judgement. For example, AI bot therapists must have clear escalation paths that loop in clinicians during critical moments, which improves treatment and lowers the risk of adoption for both patients and providers.  

• Designed with providers, not just for them – The best behavioral health AI tools are built in partnership with clinicians. Look for solutions developed with real provider input from the start and not just usability feedback at the end. That collaboration leads to smarter design choices, smoother interoperability, and better adoption across care teams.

• Start small, prove value, then scale – No AI tool should go from pilot to systemwide overnight. Look for early wins: better screening accuracy, less time spent on documentation, improved treatment adherence. Those are the signs of a tool that’s actually working, and worth expanding.

AI is already making a real difference in behavioral health. It’s helping providers stay present with patients, ensuring evidence-based protocols are followed, and flagging risks before they become crises. 

But progress is uneven. Not every tool works out of the box. Not every system plays well with others. And not every platform understands the nuance of behavioral care. That’s not failure. It’s the reality of building something new.

To move forward, we need shared standards, smarter safeguards, and a willingness to learn from what works and what doesn’t. Behavioral health doesn’t need tech that replaces people. It needs technology that respects them, amplifying what clinicians do best and helping more people get the care they deserve.

This moment isn’t about chasing hype. It’s about building a stronger foundation for the future of care. Together, we can get it right.

Photo: metamorworks, Getty Images

Melissa Tran is Chief Executive Officer of ProsperityEHR, where she leads the company’s mission to modernize behavioral health infrastructure. A seasoned health-tech leader, Melissa has held senior roles at Epic, Bluetree Network, Tegria, and the University of Wisconsin, with deep expertise in clinical systems, virtual care, and healthcare operations.

Dr. Heidi V. Carlson is a licensed psychologist and marriage and family therapist at River Valley Behavioral Health & Wellness Center, specializing in counseling psychology. She holds a doctorate from the University of St. Thomas and a master’s degree in community counseling with an emphasis in marriage and family therapy. Dr. Carlson has extensive experience providing psychological and cognitive assessments, as well as psychotherapy for individuals, couples, families, and groups across hospital, school, residential, and outpatient settings. Her areas of expertise include trauma, brain development, attachment, adoption, mood disorders, and treatment program development. In addition to clinical work, she provides consultation and training to schools, hospitals, and organizations on a range of mental health topics.

This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.